UK’s Public Interest Disclosure Act of 1998

1998 CHAPTER 23

An Act to protect individuals who make certain disclosures of information in the public interest; to allow such individuals to bring action in respect of victimisation; and for connected purposes.

[2nd July 1998]

Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—

1Protected disclosures

After Part IV of the [1996 c. 18.] Employment Rights Act 1996 (in this Act referred to as “the 1996 Act”) there is inserted—

Part IVAProtected disclosures

43AMeaning of “protected disclosure”

In this Act a “protected disclosure” means a qualifying disclosure (as defined by section 43B) which is made by a worker in accordance with any of sections 43C to 43H.

43BDisclosures qualifying for protection

(1)In this Part a “qualifying disclosure” means any disclosure of information which, in the reasonable belief of the worker making the disclosure, tends to show one or more of the following—

(a)that a criminal offence has been committed, is being committed or is likely to be committed,

(b)that a person has failed, is failing or is likely to fail to comply with any legal obligation to which he is subject,

(c)that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur,

(d)that the health or safety of any individual has been, is being or is likely to be endangered,

(e)that the environment has been, is being or is likely to be damaged, or

(f)that information tending to show any matter falling within any one of the preceding paragraphs has been, is being or is likely to be deliberately concealed.

(2)For the purposes of subsection (1), it is immaterial whether the relevant failure occurred, occurs or would occur in the United Kingdom or elsewhere, and whether the law applying to it is that of the United Kingdom or of any other country or territory.

(3)A disclosure of information is not a qualifying disclosure if the person making the disclosure commits an offence by making it.

(4)A disclosure of information in respect of which a claim to legal professional privilege (or, in Scotland, to confidentiality as between client and professional legal adviser) could be maintained in legal proceedings is not a qualifying disclosure if it is made by a person to whom the information had been disclosed in the course of obtaining legal advice.

(5)In this Part “the relevant failure”, in relation to a qualifying disclosure, means the matter falling within paragraphs (a) to (f) of subsection (1).

43CDisclosure to employer or other responsible person

(1)A qualifying disclosure is made in accordance with this section if the worker makes the disclosure in good faith—

(a)to his employer, or

(b)where the worker reasonably believes that the relevant failure relates solely or mainly to—

(i)the conduct of a person other than his employer, or

(ii)any other matter for which a person other than his employer has legal responsibility,

to that other person.

(2)A worker who, in accordance with a procedure whose use by him is authorised by his employer, makes a qualifying disclosure to a person other than his employer, is to be treated for the purposes of this Part as making the qualifying disclosure to his employer.

43DDisclosure to legal adviser

A qualifying disclosure is made in accordance with this section if it is made in the course of obtaining legal advice.

43EDisclosure to Minister of the Crown

A qualifying disclosure is made in accordance with this section if—

(a)the worker’s employer is—

(i)an individual appointed under any enactment by a Minister of the Crown, or

(ii)a body any of whose members are so appointed, and

(b)the disclosure is made in good faith to a Minister of the Crown.

43FDisclosure to prescribed person

(1)A qualifying disclosure is made in accordance with this section if the worker—

(a)makes the disclosure in good faith to a person prescribed by an order made by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this section, and

(b)reasonably believes—

(i)that the relevant failure falls within any description of matters in respect of which that person is so prescribed, and

(ii)that the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, are substantially true.

(2)An order prescribing persons for the purposes of this section may specify persons or descriptions of persons, and shall specify the descriptions of matters in respect of which each person, or persons of each description, is or are prescribed.

43GDisclosure in other cases

(1)A qualifying disclosure is made in accordance with this section if—

(a)the worker makes the disclosure in good faith,

(b)he reasonably believes that the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, are substantially true,

(c)he does not make the disclosure for purposes of personal gain,

(d)any of the conditions in subsection (2) is met, and

(e)in all the circumstances of the case, it is reasonable for him to make the disclosure.

(2)The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(d) are—

(a)that, at the time he makes the disclosure, the worker reasonably believes that he will be subjected to a detriment by his employer if he makes a disclosure to his employer or in accordance with section 43F,

(b)that, in a case where no person is prescribed for the purposes of section 43F in relation to the relevant failure, the worker reasonably believes that it is likely that evidence relating to the relevant failure will be concealed or destroyed if he makes a disclosure to his employer, or

(c)that the worker has previously made a disclosure of substantially the same information—

(i)to his employer, or

(ii)in accordance with section 43F.

(3)In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)(e) whether it is reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure, regard shall be had, in particular, to—

(a)the identity of the person to whom the disclosure is made,

(b)the seriousness of the relevant failure,

(c)whether the relevant failure is continuing or is likely to occur in the future,

(d)whether the disclosure is made in breach of a duty of confidentiality owed by the employer to any other person,

(e)in a case falling within subsection (2)(c)(i) or (ii), any action which the employer or the person to whom the previous disclosure in accordance with section 43F was made has taken or might reasonably be expected to have taken as a result of the previous disclosure, and

(f)in a case falling within subsection (2)(c)(i), whether in making the disclosure to the employer the worker complied with any procedure whose use by him was authorised by the employer.

(4)For the purposes of this section a subsequent disclosure may be regarded as a disclosure of substantially the same information as that disclosed by a previous disclosure as mentioned in subsection (2)(c) even though the subsequent disclosure extends to information about action taken or not taken by any person as a result of the previous disclosure.

43HDisclosure of exceptionally serious failure

(1)A qualifying disclosure is made in accordance with this section if—

(a)the worker makes the disclosure in good faith,

(b)he reasonably believes that the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, are substantially true,

(c)he does not make the disclosure for purposes of personal gain,

(d)the relevant failure is of an exceptionally serious nature, and

(e)in all the circumstances of the case, it is reasonable for him to make the disclosure.

(2)In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)(e) whether it is reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure, regard shall be had, in particular, to the identity of the person to whom the disclosure is made.

43JContractual duties of confidentiality

(1)Any provision in an agreement to which this section applies is void in so far as it purports to preclude the worker from making a protected disclosure.

(2)This section applies to any agreement between a worker and his employer (whether a worker’s contract or not), including an agreement to refrain from instituting or continuing any proceedings under this Act or any proceedings for breach of contract.

43KExtension of meaning of “worker” etc. for Part IVA

(1)For the purposes of this Part “worker” includes an individual who is not a worker as defined by section 230(3) but who—

(a)works or worked for a person in circumstances in which—

(i)he is or was introduced or supplied to do that work by a third person, and

(ii)the terms on which he is or was engaged to do the work are or were in practice substantially determined not by him but by the person for whom he works or worked, by the third person or by both of them,

(b)contracts or contracted with a person, for the purposes of that person’s business, for the execution of work to be done in a place not under the control or management of that person and would fall within section 230(3)(b) if for “personally” in that provision there were substituted “(whether personally or otherwise)”,

(c)works or worked as a person providing general medical services, general dental services, general ophthalmic services or pharmaceutical services in accordance with arrangements made—

(i)by a Health Authority under section 29, 35, 38 or 41 of the National Health Service Act 1977, or

(ii)by a Health Board under section 19, 25, 26 or 27 of the National Health Service (Scotland) Act 1978, or

(d)is or was provided with work experience provided pursuant to a training course or programme or with training for employment (or with both) otherwise than—

(i)under a contract of employment, or

(ii)by an educational establishment on a course run by that establishment;

and any reference to a worker’s contract, to employment or to a worker being “employed” shall be construed accordingly.

(2)For the purposes of this Part “employer” includes—

(a)in relation to a worker falling within paragraph (a) of subsection (1), the person who substantially determines or determined the terms on which he is or was engaged,

(b)in relation to a worker falling within paragraph (c) of that subsection, the authority or board referred to in that paragraph, and

(c)in relation to a worker falling within paragraph (d) of that subsection, the person providing the work experience or training.

(3)In this section “educational establishment” includes any university, college, school or other educational establishment.

43LOther interpretative provisions

(1)In this Part—

  • “qualifying disclosure” has the meaning given by section 43B;

  • “the relevant failure”, in relation to a qualifying disclosure, has the meaning given by section 43B(5).

(2)In determining for the purposes of this Part whether a person makes a disclosure for purposes of personal gain, there shall be disregarded any reward payable by or under any enactment.

(3)Any reference in this Part to the disclosure of information shall have effect, in relation to any case where the person receiving the information is already aware of it, as a reference to bringing the information to his attention.

2Right not to suffer detriment

After section 47A of the 1996 Act there is inserted—

47BProtected disclosures

(1)A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure.

(2)Except where the worker is an employee who is dismissed in circumstances in which, by virtue of section 197, Part X does not apply to the dismissal, this section does not apply where—

(a)the worker is an employee, and

(b)the detriment in question amounts to dismissal (within the meaning of that Part).

(3)For the purposes of this section, and of sections 48 and 49 so far as relating to this section, “worker”, “worker’s contract”, “employment” and “employer” have the extended meaning given by section 43K.

3Complaints to employment tribunal

In section 48 of the 1996 Act (complaints to employment tribunals), after subsection (1) there is inserted—

(1A)A worker may present a complaint to an employment tribunal that he has been subjected to a detriment in contravention of section 47B.

4Limit on amount of compensation

(1)Section 49 of the 1996 Act (remedies) is amended as follows.

(2)At the beginning of subsection (2) there is inserted “Subject to subsection (6)”.

(3)After subsection (5) there is inserted—

(6)Where—

(a)the complaint is made under section 48(1A),

(b)the detriment to which the worker is subjected is the termination of his worker’s contract, and

(c)that contract is not a contract of employment,

any compensation must not exceed the compensation that would be payable under Chapter II of Part X if the worker had been an employee and had been dismissed for the reason specified in section 103A.

5Unfair dismissal

After section 103 of the 1996 Act there is inserted—

103AProtected disclosure

An employee who is dismissed shall be regarded for the purposes of this Part as unfairly dismissed if the reason (or, if more than one, the principal reason) for the dismissal is that the employee made a protected disclosure.

6Redundancy

After subsection (6) of section 105 of the 1996 Act (redundancy) there is inserted—

(6A)This subsection applies if the reason (or, if more than one, the principal reason) for which the employee was selected for dismissal was that specified in section 103A.

7Exclusion of restrictions on right not to be unfairly dismissed

(1)In subsection (3) of section 108 of the 1996 Act (cases where qualifying period of employment not required), after paragraph (f) there is inserted—

(ff)section 103A applies,

(2)In subsection (2) of section 109 of the 1996 Act (disapplication of upper age limit), after paragraph (f) there is inserted—

(ff)section 103A applies,.

8Compensation for unfair dismissal

(1)In section 112(4) of the 1996 Act (compensation for unfair dismissal) after “sections 118 to 127A” there is inserted “or in accordance with regulations under section 127B”.

(2)In section 117 of that Act (enforcement of order for reinstatement or re-engagement)—

(a)in subsection (2) after “section 124” there is inserted “and to regulations under section 127B”, and

(b)in subsection (3) after “and (2)” there is inserted “and to regulations under section 127B”.

(3)In section 118 of that Act (general provisions as to unfair dismissal), at the beginning of subsection (1) there is inserted “Subject to regulations under section 127B,”.

(4)After section 127A of the 1996 Act there is inserted—

127BDismissal as a result of protected disclosure

(1)This section applies where the reason (or, if more than one, the principal reason)—

(a)in a redundancy case, for selecting the employee for dismissal, or

(b)otherwise, for the dismissal,

is that specified in section 103A.

(2)The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that where this section applies any award of compensation for unfair dismissal under section 112(4) or 117(1) or 117(3) shall, instead of being calculated in accordance with the provisions of sections 117 to 127A, consist of one or more awards calculated in such manner as may be prescribed by the regulations.

(3)Regulations under this section may, in particular, apply any of the provisions of sections 117 to 127A with such modifications as may be specified in the regulations.

9Interim relief

In sections 128(1)(b) and 129(1) of the 1996 Act (which relate to interim relief) for “or 103” there is substituted “, 103 or 103A”.

10Crown employment

In section 191 of the 1996 Act (Crown employment), in subsection (2) after paragraph (a) there is inserted—

(aa)Part IVA,.

11National security

(1)Section 193 of the 1996 Act (national security) is amended as follows.

(2)In subsection (2) after paragraph (b) there is inserted—

(bb)Part IVA,

(bc)in Part V, section 47B,.

(3)After subsection (3) of that section there is inserted—

(4)Part IVA and sections 47B and 103A do not have effect in relation to employment for the purposes of the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service or the Government Communications Headquarters.

12Work outside Great Britain

(1)Section 196 of the 1996 Act (employment outside Great Britain) is amended as follows.

(2)After subsection (3) there is inserted—

(3A)Part IVA and section 47B do not apply to employment where under the worker’s contract he ordinarily works outside Great Britain.

(3)In subsection (5), after “subsections (2)” there is inserted “, (3A)”.

13Police officers

In section 200 of the 1996 Act (police officers), in subsection (1) (which lists provisions of the Act which do not apply to employment under a contract of employment in police service, or to persons engaged in such employment)—

(a)after “Part III” there is inserted “, Part IVA”, and

(b)after “47” there is inserted “, 47B”.

14Remedy for infringement of rights

In section 205 of the 1996 Act (remedy for infringement of certain rights) after subsection (1) there is inserted—

(1A)In relation to the right conferred by section 47B, the reference in subsection (1) to an employee has effect as a reference to a worker.

15Interpretative provisions of 1996 Act

(1)At the end of section 230 of the 1996 Act (employees, workers etc) there is inserted—

(6)This section has effect subject to sections 43K and 47B(3); and for the purposes of Part XIII so far as relating to Part IVA or section 47B, “worker”, “worker’s contract” and, in relation to a worker, “employer”, “employment” and “employed” have the extended meaning given by section 43K.

(2)In section 235 of the 1996 Act (other definitions) after the definition of “position” there is inserted—

“protected disclosure” has the meaning given by section 43A,.

16Dismissal of those taking part in unofficial industrial action

(1)In section 237 of the [1992 c. 52.] Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (dismissal of those taking part in unofficial industrial action), in subsection (1A) (which provides that the exclusion of the right to complain of unfair dismissal does not apply in certain cases)—

(a)for “or 103” there is substituted “, 103 or 103A”, and

(b)for “and employee representative cases)” there is substituted “employee representative and protected disclosure cases)”.

17Corresponding provision for Northern Ireland

An Order in Council under paragraph 1(1)(b) of Schedule 1 to the [1974 c. 28.] Northern Ireland Act 1974 (legislation for Northern Ireland in the interim period) which states that it is made only for purposes corresponding to those of this Act—

(a)shall not be subject to paragraph 1(4) and (5) of that Schedule (affirmative resolution of both Houses of Parliament), but

(b)shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.

18Short title, interpretation, commencement and extent

(1)This Act may be cited as the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.

(2)In this Act “the 1996 Act” means the [1996 c. 18.] Employment Rights Act 1996.

(3)Subject to subsection (4), this Act shall come into force on such day or days as the Secretary of State may by order made by statutory instrument appoint, and different days may be appointed for different purposes.

(4)The following provisions shall come into force on the passing of this Act—

(a)section 1 so far as relating to the power to make an order under section 43F of the 1996 Act,

(b)section 8 so far as relating to the power to make regulations under section 127B of the 1996 Act,

(c)section 17, and

(d)this section.”

(5)This Act, except section 17, does not extend to Northern Ireland.

.

UK’s Public Interest Disclosure Act of 1998

UK 2013: the Independent Whistleblowing Commission

“In November 2013 the Whistleblowing Commission, convened by the London-based whistleblower support NGO Public Concern at Work, released 25 recommendations for improving whistleblowing in UK workplaces.

Chief among the recommendations made by the Whistleblowing Commission is the adoption of a Code of Practice, drafted by the Commission, which could be taken into consideration by courts and tribunals considering whistleblowing cases”

THE KEY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMISSION:

  • The Secretary of State to adopt the Commission’s Code of Practice detailing whistleblowing arrangements in the workplace. This Code of Practice to be taken into account by courts and tribunals when whistleblowing issues arise. (Rec 1)
  • Regulators to require or encourage the adoption of this Code of Practice by those they regulate. (Rec 2)
  • Regulators should review the licence or registration of organisations which fail to have in place effective whistleblowing arrangements. (Rec 3)
  • Regulators to be more transparent about their own whistleblowing arrangements and annually report on their operations. (Rec 5)
  • Specific provisions against the blacklisting of whistleblowers. (Rec 10)
  • Strengthening anti-gagging provisions in the law. (Recs 17 & 18)
  • Specialist training for tribunal members to handle whistleblowing claims effectively. (Rec 21)
  • Strengthening and clarifying the legal protection for whistleblowers contained within the Public Interest Disclosure Act. (Recs 8-20)
  • Updating and broadening the definition of worker to include: student nurses, doctors, social workers and health care workers; volunteers and interns; priests; foster carers; non-executive directors; public appointments;  LLP members and all categories of workers listed under the Equality Act 2010. (Rec 10)”

https://blueprintforfreespeech.net/independent-uk-whistleblowing-commission-makes-recommendations-for-framework-improvements

http://www.pcaw.org.uk/whistleblowing-commission-public-consultation

UK 2013: the Independent Whistleblowing Commission

The legal protection of whistleblowers in the G20 countries – Melbourne view, 2014

“The whistleblower protection laws of most G20 countries would not adequately shield government and corporate employees who report corruption, fraud and other wrongdoing, a new report released today has found.

Despite a public pledge in 2010 to pass adequate whistleblower protections within two years, most G20 countries have failed to do so, according to Whistleblower Protection Laws in G20 Countries: Priorities for Action.

The report, the first to comprehensively assess whistleblower protections in the G20, was produced by an international team led by Blueprint for Free Speech, the University of Melbourne, Griffith University and Transparency International Australia.

Without strong laws to protect them from retaliation, employees working in government institutions and private companies are deterred from coming forward to report crime and misconduct. This perpetuates government and corporate misconduct, leading to wasted taxpayer money, unsafe consumer products, public health threats, environmental crimes and human rights violations.

Lead author Simon Wolfe, Blueprint’s Head of Research and a Visiting Scholar at University of Melbourne Law School said whistleblowing is by far one of the most effective ways to expose wrongdoing..

“Endemic or hidden corruption may only be identified by someone ‘in the know’. Without whistleblowers, much wrongdoing would go unnoticed”.

“G20 countries are only hurting themselves by not giving whistleblowers safe avenues to report wrongdoing,” said Wolfe, who is also. “Whistleblowers step up when criminals escape the eye of police and regulators.”

Dr Suelette Dreyfus a Research Fellow from the University of Melbourne’s Department of Computing and Information Systems said that Whistleblower protection laws covering the private sector need attention.

“That’s true across the G20 countries. Those with particularly poor whistleblower policies include Argentina, Brazil, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey,” she said.

The report identifies several key areas in need of improvement in many G20 countries, including more reliable channels to report misconduct; opportunities for employees to report wrongdoing anonymously; the need for agencies to investigate whistleblowers’ disclosures and retaliation complaints; and better enforcement of whistleblower laws.

As an indication of progress, whistleblower laws in the Republic of Korea, South Africa, the UK and US contain many strong provisions to protect employees from retaliation.

“Whistleblowers have helped save countless lives and recover billions of dollars in stolen and lost funds worldwide,” said report co-author Professor A.J. Brown of Griffith University. “They are a legitimate, valued partner in the fight against crime and corruption.”

“Citizen demands for stronger whistleblower rights are arising from all corners of the world,” said Professor Brown. “People no longer accept the idea that they should be punished for doing the right thing.””

Most G20 Whistleblower laws inadequate

The legal protection of whistleblowers in the G20 countries – Melbourne view, 2014

Fantastic description of whistleblower retaliation

Spotlight the Whistleblowers

This common retaliatory strategy seeks to make the whistleblower, instead of his or her message, the issue: employers will try to create smokescreens by attacking the source’s motives, credibility, professional competence, or virtually anything else that will work to cloud the issues s/he has raised.

Manufacture a Poor Record
Employers occasionally spend months or years building a record to brand a whistleblower as a chronic problem employee. To lay the groundwork for termination, employers may begin to compile memoranda about any incident, real or contrived, that conveys inadequate or problematic performance; whistleblowers who formerly received sterling performance evaluations may begin to receive poor ratings from supervisors.

Threaten Them into Silence
This tactic is commonly reflected in statements such as, “You’ll never work again in this town/industry/agency. . .” Threats can also be indirect: employers may issue gag orders, for example, forbidding the whistleblower from speaking out under threat of termination.

Isolate or Humiliate Them
Another retaliation technique is to make an example of the whistleblower by separating him or her from colleagues. This may remove him or her from access to information necessary to effectively blow the whistle. Employers also may exercise the bureaucratic equivalent of placing a whistleblower in the public stocks: a top manager may be reassigned to tasks such as sweeping the floors or counting the rolls of toilet paper in the bathroom. Often this tactic is combined with measures to strip the whistleblower of his or her duties, sometimes to facilitate subsequent termination.

Set Them Up for Failure
Perhaps as common as the retaliatory tactic of isolating or humiliating whistleblowers by stripping them of their duties is its converse-overloading them with unmanageable work. This involves assigning a whistleblower responsibilities and then making it impossible to fulfill them. One approach is to withdraw the research privileges, data access, or subordinate staff necessary for a whistleblower to perform the job. Another is to put the whistleblower on a pedestal of cards-to appoint him or her to solve the problem s/he has exposed, and then refuse to provide the resources or authority to follow through.

Prosecute Them
The longstanding threat to attack whistleblowers for “stealing” the evidence used to expose misconduct is becoming more serious, particularly for private property that is evidence of illegality. Government workers even have been threatened with prosecution under a McCarthy-era statute for being “disloyal” to the United States, after they made disclosures to or participated in meetings with environmental groups involved in lawsuits challenging illegal government activity. Until adoption of an anti-gag statute, passed annually in appropriations legislation since 1987, workers with security clearances risked prosecution unless they obtained advance permission before blowing the whistle (even on information that was not marked as classified), effectively waiving their constitutional rights.

Eliminate Their Jobs or Paralyze Their Careers
A common tactic is to lay off whistleblowers even as the company or agency is hiring new staff. Employers may “reorganize” whistleblowers out of jobs or into marginal positions. Another retaliation technique is to deep-freeze the careers of those who manage to thwart termination and hold on to their jobs: employers may simply deny all requests for promotion or transfer. Sometimes it is not enough merely to fire or make whistleblowers rot in their jobs. The goal is to make sure they “will never work again” in their fields by blacklisting them: bad references for future job prospects are common.

http://bulliedacademics.blogspot.co.uk/2007/01/recognizing-retaliation-risks-and-costs.html

which is citing

Fantastic description of whistleblower retaliation